U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20250
|
DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION |
Number: DR
4020-250-002 |
|
|
SUBJECT: Position Management and Vacancy Control |
DATE: October 18, 2010 |
|
|
OPI: |
||
Section Page
1 Purpose 1
2 Background 2
3 References 2
4 Definitions 3
5 Policy 3
6 Responsibilities 4
7 Position
Management Guidelines 6
8 Span of Control Guidelines 6
9 Organization
Assessment Guidelines 7
10 Procedures 8
11 Accountability
and Oversight 8
Appendix
A A-1
Appendix
B B-1
Appendix
C C-1
1. PURPOSE
This
directive establishes the Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) policy and
framework for managing positions and filling vacancies throughout USDA, with an
overall goal of conserving resources, while sustaining the USDA mission and
improving the delivery of services to stakeholders. When filling positions, creating new
organizations or establishing new missions (with additional staff), supervisors
and managers must deliberately consider workforce planning and position
management principles together with annual workforce and succession plans. Supporting documentation developed through
this process will also provide the framework to justify reorganization of units
through the Department Regulation (DR) 1010-001, Organization.
2. BACKGROUND
a.
Through
the implementation of this policy, USDA expects to ensure the effective
management of resources and increase the quality
of services by:
(1)
Improving
the supervisory span of control.
(2)
Increasing
cost savings where functions or the grade level of positions can be changed, or
the work adjusted, or redirected.
(3)
Eliminating
duplicative functions or unnecessary layering.
(4)
Institutionalizing
the principles of hiring reform, succession and workforce analysis/planning in
USDA operations.
(5) Controlling costs for personnel as well as
space, equipment, and utilities for those resources.
b. USDA’s priority is to ensure that our
workforce is strong, prepared, and motivated to face the challenges and opportunities
that lay ahead. We must:
(1) Ensure workforce and succession planning
efforts result in the most effective organization to support programs.
(2) Ensure the recruitment and retention of a
high performing workforce.
(3) Have active commitment from executive level
leaders to create the most efficient organization possible.
c. Effective workforce and succession
planning can also provide the opportunity to develop employees. New skills may allow employees to assume new
roles which could provide more productive ways of doing the work.
d. Workforce
and succession planning is core to developing the most effective organization,
but agencies must use all the tools available to accomplish their mission while
providing quality services to the American public.
3. REFERENCES
a.
Title
5, United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapters 51 – Classification and 53 – Pay Rates
and Systems.
b.
Title
5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 511 – Classification Under the General
Schedule, and 532 – Prevailing Rate Systems.
c.
Departmental
Regulation 4020-250-1, USDA Human Capital Accountability System.
d.
USDA
Strategic Workforce Plan (dated December 2008 covering Calendar Year 2008-2010).
4. DEFINITIONS
Agency. An organizational unit of the Department,
other than a Staff Office as defined below, whose head reports to an Under
Secretary.
Staff Office. A Departmental Administrative Office whose
head reports to the Secretary or Assistant Secretary.
Position Management. Position management is the continuous
and systematic process for determining the number of positions needed, the
skill and knowledge requirements of those positions and the organizational
grouping of positions to carry out the work of an organizational unit.
Workload
Analysis. The descriptive baseline
of the resource requirements by discipline, priorities, skill sets, and
training to perform work in a business unit.
Workforce
Analysis. The comprehensive and
systematic process for determining the number of people needed with the right
skills and competencies necessary to perform the work in an organization. This analysis provides the framework for
making staffing decisions based on the mission, strategic plan, and budgetary
resources.
Succession
Planning. An assessment of the current situation to plan the workforce of
the future, including developing a plan to address succession of current
workers as they leave the workforce due to retirement, attrition, and other
factors.
5. POLICY
a.
USDA policy requires responsible stewardship of
resources and accountability for the strategic management of human resources. To achieve this goal, USDA is establishing a
system of human resources management that reflects strategic workforce and
succession planning, accountable leadership, and performance that is measured
and continuously improved. Through this
policy, we will develop and maintain a high performing workforce that achieves
its mission within budget and with the most efficient organization possible. The
Department will accomplish this through sound organizational assessment; task,
function and structure reviews (e.g., to eliminate unessential positions and
functions; to redesign the work; to enhance the skills of the existing staff);
implementing quality improvement efforts; and validating that new hires are justified.
b.
Annually, each Staff Office/Agency must conduct an
analysis of its current workforce, projected mission, workload (to include
eliminating unnecessary work), and required workforce and address any gaps or
deficiencies. The workforce plan must also consider projected losses
(retirements, historical turnover rates, etc.) and identify recruitment
strategies that will ensure a diverse and balanced workforce. This plan will serve as the framework for
establishing and maintaining organizational staffing plans of position allocations
consistent with authorized budgetary ceilings.
c.
To
ensure achievement of these goals, and effective immediately, prior to
recruiting any (new or existing) position, the hiring manager and his/her
supervisor are required to validate the need for filling the position. This validation is based on an assessment of whether
the duties can be eliminated, assigned to an existing position, or reengineered
within the existing organizational unit.
The workforce analysis process for validation is described above in paragraph
5b and must be completed using the Appendix A decision checklist.
6.
RESPONSIBILITIES
a.
USDA’s
Office of Human Resources Management (OHRM) is responsible for:
(1)
Facilitating
accomplishment of the strategic workforce and succession planning process with Staff
Office Directors, Agency Heads, and Mission Area Human Resources Directors.
(2)
Providing
advice and assistance to Staff Offices/Agencies on the effective management of
resources including their responsibility for selecting, developing, training,
and managing a high-quality, productive workforce.
(2) Ensuring that Staff Offices/Agencies
have established effective procedures to create or fill positions.
(3) Verifying through Staff Office/Agency
accountability audits and through periodic reviews of Appendix A decision documents
that organizations are adhering to this regulation.
b.
Staff
Office Directors and Agency Heads are responsible for:
(1)
Assessing
workforce characteristics and needs to align the organization’s human resources
policies and programs with the agency’s mission, strategic goals, and
performance objectives.
(2)
Ensuring
that sound principles of organization design and position management are
followed when evaluating the need for organizational changes and the establishment
of positions, and that decisions are validated and consistent with merit
principles.
(3)
Conducting
workforce analysis and organizational efficiency/effectiveness studies to
support sound position management.
(4)
Developing
and implementing effective strategies to attract, develop, manage and retain
skilled employees as detailed in the organization’s annual workforce/succession
plan.
(5)
Training
personnel and supervisors in the procedures that have been established in this
Departmental Regulation.
(6)
Maintaining
decision documents regarding the recruiting of vacant positions until the
position once again becomes vacant and/or in accordance with retention records
for staffing and classification case files.
(7)
Maintaining
staffing plans for each organizational unit that document authorized and
budgeted position allocations.
(8)
Communicating
all policies, practices and business processes in standard operating procedures
(SOP’s).
(9)
Ensuring
proper internal controls are established and documented at all levels of the
organization to determine the need for replacement or new staff.
(10)
Continuously
reviewing business processes to ensure they are being performed as efficiently
as possible.
c.
Servicing
Human Resources Directors are responsible for:
(1)
Working
with senior level staff and managers to provide guidance and assistance to
facilitate the process for completion of documents to justify positions.
(2)
Ensuring
accountability throughout the process in working with managers to support USDA
and OHRM efforts.
(3)
Completing
required reports as required in paragraph 11.
7. POSITION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
a. The authority and responsibility to
establish, classify and manage positions resides with each Staff Office
Director and Agency Head. Authority may
be further delegated to Mission Area and Agency Human Resources Directors and
other officials as appropriate. Sound
position management achieves an economical and effective position structure
that is critical to the proper and responsible use of limited financial and human
resources while blending the skills and responsibilities of employees to
successfully achieve the organization’s mission.
b.
A
carefully designed structure will result in reasonable and supportable grade
levels and an effective organizational design.
The optimum structure provides balance among mission needs, economy and
efficiency of operations, sound skill and knowledge utilization, and maximum
attraction and retention of employees.
c.
When
a classification specialist receives a request to classify a position (new or an
update), the specialist must review the checklist (Appendix A), and if the
specialist has questions or concerns, these must be resolved with the
requesting organization before the specialist may proceed with the
classification action. In addition, the
specialist must complete an evaluation of the classification action to ensure:
(1)
Proper
position classification and effective position design.
(2)
That
established positions are not over-graded or under-graded.
(3)
Classification
consistency with comparable work and positions.
8. SPAN OF CONTROL GUIDELINES
a. The primary goals of maximizing the span
of control for supervisors, measured as the supervisor-to-employee ratio, are
to ensure organizations function effectively and efficiently while ensuring the
appropriate level of employee supervision and guidance. In addition, eliminating needless layers of
supervision can increase workforce empowerment.
b. USDA’s targeted supervisor-to-employee
ratio is a minimum of one supervisor for nine (1:9) employees. When the span of control is lower than nine
employees for a supervisor, the Staff Office Director or Agency Head must
document the reason for the variation.
c. When determining an appropriate span of
control, the following factors are to be considered:
(1) Job complexity: subordinate jobs that are complex, ambiguous,
dynamic or otherwise complicated may require more management involvement and a
narrower span of control.
(2) Similarity of subordinate jobs: the more similar and routine the tasks that
subordinates are performing, the easier it may be for a manager to supervise
employees which may result in a wider span of control.
(3) Diversity of assigned functions:
an office having multiple discreet functions and unique skill sets to
accomplish those functions may result in a narrower span of control.
(4) Physical proximity of subordinates
and technology: the more geographically dispersed a group of
subordinates, the more difficult it may be for a manager to be in regular
contact with them which may result in a narrower span of control. Depending on the functions and situation, use
of technology such as cell phones, blackberries, email and the use of telework flexibilities
may facilitate communication and the exchange of information to alleviate span
of control issues.
9. ORGANIZATION
ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES
Organization assessment and design provides
the framework for integrating the mission, functions, people, information, and
technology of an organization to accomplish its mission. The organization structure defines the formal
reporting relationships among staff members, supporting their roles and
responsibilities. Administrative systems
within an organization provide the guidelines for how the organization operates. Information and technology support the
processes through which members achieve outcomes. Each element must support the other
components in order to achieve the organization’s mission. Consider the following when contemplating
organizational change:
a.
What
are the primary goals and objectives that need to be accomplished?
b.
How
can the required activities be divided so that the work can be accomplished
(related activities; similar tasks)?
c.
What
authority and responsibility needs to be assigned to carry out the work?
d.
How
and by whom should decisions be made?
e.
How
specialized should individual staff roles be?
f.
Who
should control the work being performed?
g.
How
can communication and coordination among members of the organization be
facilitated?
h.
How
can job and role descriptions be developed to take into account both functions
and accountabilities?
10. PROCEDURES
a.
When a position becomes vacant or when a new
position is being considered for creation (and this includes creation of new
organizational units) and before an SF-52, Request for Personnel Action (or
similar document), is submitted to begin the hiring process, the hiring
authority and the hiring authority’s supervisor, must validate the need for
establishing a new, or filling an existing position. The validation process must include
consideration of alternate ways to meet the need. Decisions shall be documented using Appendix
A.
b.
If the supervisor decides not to fill the vacancy
and not to distribute the associated workload to others, then no further action
is required except to maintain the completed Appendix A in accordance with
staffing and classification case files.
c.
If
the supervisor decides to either fill the vacancy or redistribute the
associated workload to others, the completed Appendix A must accompany the SF
52 requesting the classification action.
Human resources personnel may not process any recruiting or position
change action without a completed Appendix A.
d.
Requests
for recruiting career SES/SL personnel must include the checklist in Appendix A
and must also address the supervisor-to-employee ratio for the entire
organization under the purview of the proposed position. If the span of control is
less than one-to-nine (1:9), an explanation must accompany the recruit request.
e.
Staff
Offices, Mission Areas or Agencies may establish a Position Management
Committee or other such body, as appropriate, to evaluate positions by groups,
levels, or individual actions. Completed
Appendix A documentation will be prepared and submitted to the Committee for
review.
f.
Emergency hiring needs or other
extenuating circumstances requiring immediate response such as emergency response
positions that are mission critical may be excepted from this policy on a case-by-case
basis with the approval of the Staff Office Director or Agency Head.
11. ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERSIGHT
a.
Biennially,
during the self-assessment accountability review of its HR function, each Staff
Office or Agency will review a representative random sample of completed
Appendix A decisions to ensure consistency with the HR accountability plan and
workforce and succession planning efforts.
Staff Office or Agency findings in this review shall be incorporated as
part of the Staff Office or Agency annual workforce analysis outlined in
paragraph 5b.
b.
In January
of each year, the Staff Office or Agency will review a representative random
sample of completed appendix A forms from the prior fiscal year to determine if
procedures are in place, are effective and are being followed. The Agency or Staff Office will certify the
results of this review and submit the findings to the servicing HR office by
January 31 using the format in Appendix B.
The servicing HR office will report
the results of this review to OHRM by February 15 using the Appendix B format. The report must be signed by the Director of
the servicing HR office and the Staff Office or Agency Head.
c.
The Staff
Office or Agency will further review the supervisor-to-employee ratio for their
organization in January of each year and will submit reports to the servicing
HR office for review by January 31 using the format in Appendix C. The servicing HR office will report the
results of this review to OHRM by February 15 using the Appendix C format.
d.
OHRM
may, at its discretion, conduct periodic reviews of completed documentation to
verify that procedures are in place.
END
Appendix A
Position
Management and Workforce/Succession Planning Checklist
|
Agency: |
Date: |
|||
|
Division /Office: |
Supervisor: |
|||
|
Position Title/Series: |
Working Title: |
Grade: |
||
Workforce and succession planning
provides the means for achieving overarching program goals. Program goals will not be achieved
"without the right number of people with the right skills in the right
place at the right time." As agencies develop strategies that support the
achievement of both long-term and annual program performance goals in their
strategic and performance plans, they need to consider other management
initiatives, (such as workforce planning, succession planning, position
management, effective organization design), as essential components of a
broad-based management strategy.
Planning for human capital needs is one of the
greatest challenges facing managers and leaders. In order to meet this challenge, a uniform process
that provides a disciplined approach for matching human resources with the
anticipated needs of the agency is essential.
A workforce plan is a fundamental planning tool, critical to quality
performance that will contribute to the achievement of program objectives by
providing a basis for justifying budget allocations and workload staffing
levels.
In order to support the Department’s position management
initiative, hiring managers will adhere to appropriate position management
guidelines and ensure that minimum workforce analysis and succession planning
objectives are considered when evaluating vacated position(s). As such, the first step in the decision
process is to determine whether or not the hiring manager will fill the vacancy.
STEP 1: DO WE FILL THE VACANCY?
In order to answer this question, hiring managers
will need to apply solid position management principles in assessing their
options. The following checklist
constitutes the appropriate items each hiring manager and his/her supervisor
will review in conjunction with their position management review of a
vacancy. For each item, you are required
to initial in the appropriate Yes/No column your response to the item question:
|
Item # |
Item Description |
Yes |
No |
|
1. |
Have you completed a position management review of
your business unit in the past twelve months?
If not, complete the position management review using the following
guidelines. |
|
|
|
Position Management Review – In completing
the position management review, have you considered the following: ·
What work needs to be
completed in your business unit? Only
those positions for which there is a valid need based on such considerations
as organizational goals and objectives, workload, authorized staffing plans, and
funding should be created or continued. ·
Are business units
and positions structured to accomplish mission objectives efficiently and
effectively? ·
Duties and
responsibilities may change over time and may affect the type of work being
performed or the level of complexity.
When assessing the need to fill a position, do any duties need to be
added, removed or changed? ·
Does the position
description adequately and accurately reflect currently assigned duties and
responsibilities? ·
If the position is
supervisory, have you assessed the appropriateness of retaining the position
by looking at the span of control in the organization and considered whether
it should be maintained at the same level or whether other adjustments can be
made? If you are not sure about acceptable standards for
completing a position management review, you should consult with your
business unit’s assigned HR (Classification) Specialist. |
|||
|
Workload
Analysis – Workload analysis is a descriptive baseline of the
workload requirements by discipline in a business unit. It provides leaders
with a process to assist with allocating resources, communicating priorities,
identifying skills, and training employees needed to accomplish the
workload. |
|||
|
2. |
As part of the position management review and workforce analysis, did you conduct a review of the workload for the business unit to which the vacancy is assigned to determine if the work could be redistributed, or if there was any duplication or overlap of functions? |
|
|
|
3. |
Did you benchmark the findings from the workload analysis against the workload/performance of a similar business unit within and/or outside the agency to validate requirements? |
|
|
|
Workforce
Analysis –
The primary elements of the workforce analysis methodology involve a review
of the items listed below. |
|||
|
4. |
Did you determine whether or not the vacant
position is a mission critical occupation (MCO), and if the key competencies
associated with this position can be shared with another position in the
business unit? |
|
|
|
5. |
Did you evaluate the current headcount of the organization
including anticipated retirements and separations? Did you identify the current skills and
competencies of the workforce required for the business unit or your span of
control? |
|
|
|
6. |
Did you forecast the optimal headcount and
competencies needed to meet the needs of the business unit in the future? Did you identify skills and competencies
needed in MCO’s in the future workforce in your span of control? |
|
|
|
7. |
Did you evaluate the gap between the supply and
demand of the required skill sets or competencies? (The Gap Analysis identifies headcount and
competency surpluses and deficiencies. From the Gap Analysis the future
headcount and competency gap can be derived.) |
|
|
|
Balanced
Workforce
– To achieve the workforce of the future, managers complete the necessary
workforce analysis to create a balance between entry-level and mid-level
positions, and workforce competence to address future skills gaps. |
|||
|
8. |
Have you assessed what skills are currently vital
to the accomplishment of the agency’s goals and objectives? |
|
|
|
9. |
Have you addressed skill imbalances or gaps due to
attrition, including retirement over the next 5 years and the potential
impact on mission critical occupations? |
|
|
|
10. |
Have you explored training, retraining,
relocation, or recruiting options for filling competency gaps? |
|
|
|
11. |
Have you considered an effective strategy to
address skills gaps through acquiring and developing entry-level employees
for vacancies? |
|
|
Based on the review of the data and analyses
resulting from the position management review, workload and workforce analyses,
the hiring manager, in consultation with his/her supervisor and HR specialist is
equipped to make an informed decision on whether the vacancy is to be
filled. If the decision is not to fill
vacancy, this will end the process, and the hiring manager will maintain the
documentation of the analysis for future consideration.
STEP 2: Now that the Decision Is to Fill the
Position…
If the decision is to fill the position, the
following action items are to be considered:
|
Item # |
Item Description |
Yes |
No |
|
Recruitment
Strategy –
It is imperative for hiring managers to maintain an active recruitment
strategy for future vacancies. Incorporating
diversity outreach into your business unit’s workforce planning and
succession management is imperative to the agency’s effort to increase
diversity and achieve the goals of Part H of MD-715 (EEO Plan to Attain the Essential
Elements of a Model EEO Program). The Federal government has a wealth of new and
well used recruitment, retention, outreach, communication, and accountability
initiatives available for USDA Staff Offices and Agencies to obtain and keep
a diverse, high performing workforce. Hiring managers are expected to capitalize on the
recruitment initiatives that best identify and attract the top talent and
allow agencies to focus on the apprentice-level grades in order to support
effective succession management while cultivating an empowered workforce for
the future. |
|||
|
1. |
Have you engaged your HR Specialist to ensure your
efforts are aligned with the Hiring Reform Initiative? |
|
|
|
2. |
If possible, did you conduct an exit interview
with the departing staff to better understand the challenges, rewards, how
best to manage the work associated with the position, and/or recommendations
for retaining individuals in this or similar position(s)? |
|
|
|
3. |
Have you conducted on-going recruitment efforts
such as college recruiting to develop a pool of likely candidates for the
Student Career Experience Program (SCEP)? |
|
|
|
4. |
If this is an MCO vacancy and it has been a
historically hard-to-fill position, did you consider incentives such as the recruitment,
relocation and retention incentives (3 R’s)? |
|
|
|
5. |
If appropriate in this case, did you consider any
succession management resources as a viable alternative to filling this
position? |
|
|
|
6. |
If appropriate in this case, have you networked
with other hiring managers/staff of a similar business unit within the agency
for possible reassignment in order to reduce the time-to-fill and minimize
transition time so as to maintain continuity of the business unit’s
operations? |
|
|
|
7. |
Did you consider employing any of the Veterans’
hiring authorities to target veterans in support of the Department’s Veterans
hiring initiative? |
|
|
|
8. |
Did you consider employing persons with
disabilities to support the Department’s disability hiring initiative? |
|
|
|
9. |
The EEO/OCR advisor is an essential resource for
hiring managers in navigating the maze of options to achieve the goal of
increasing diversity among staff. Did
you coordinate with your EEO/OCR advisor to review current and historical
demographic data for your business unit? |
|
|
|
10. |
What are your workforce goals in support of
MD-715? How are you currently
supporting USDA’s goals for workforce planning and diversity? Please attach a wokforce profile for the
organization and a statement of efforts to address areas of
underrepresentation for Veterans; Disabled Veterans; and persons with
disabilities, and goals to address areas of underrepresentation. |
|
|
|
11. |
Have you discussed diversity recruitment options
with your Staffing Specialist and/or Special Emphasis Program (SEP)
Representative? |
|
|
|
Succession
Planning –
Succession Planning assesses the current situation to plan the workforce of
the future, including developing a plan to address succession of current
workers as they leave the workforce due to retirement, attrition, and other
factors. USDA has engaged in several
succession planning initiatives to ensure we build a modern workplace with a
modern workforce. |
|||
|
12. |
Did you review the business unit’s/agency’s
succession plan to ensure that your recruitment/workforce strategy relative
to the vacant position is aligned with the USDA and Agency succession
planning strategy? |
|
|
|
13. |
If this is an MCO and/or leadership position, did
you consider alternatives such as a leadership development or career
development opportunity for staff in the business unit or agency; a long-term
detail to develop critical competencies among staff in the business unit or
agency; integrating the position’s work requirements into a cross-functional
team environment to increase developmental opportunities for staff, etc.? |
|
|
|
14. |
If appropriate, did you consider retention
strategies for the incumbent with highly critical competencies or essential
institutional knowledge? |
|
|
___
Recruit (This checklist must accompany the SF-52.) ___ Do Not
Recruit
I
understand the critical need for position management and workforce and
succession planning as management tools to maximize use of staff and
resources. I certify that I have
considered all factors outlined in the checklist and that my responses to each
question item is accurate, as I have attempted to exhaust all resources and
strategies to ensure the most effective means of position management.
________________________________ ___________________
Hiring
Manager’s Signature Date
I
have reviewed the hiring manager’s responses to the question items in the
checklist and attest to the accuracy of the responses.
________________________________ ___________________
Hiring
Manager’s Supervisor’s Signature
Date
Appendix
B
VACANCY/HIRING
DECISION MEMORANDUM REVIEW REPORT FORMAT
Complete
this report by January 31 of each year and submit to OHRM by February 15.
Staff
Office/Agency: Date:
Point
of contact name:
Point
of contact address:
Point
of contact phone:
Point
of contact email:
I
certify this agency has conducted a review of vacancy/hiring actions and
determined that:
__
Agency procedures are effective and
being followed.
__ Agency
procedures are not being followed completely (explain).
We
reviewed __ (sample size) decision memoranda.
For the same period, there were a total of __ hiring actions.
Report
the number of decisions in each of the following categories:
__ The
position is no longer required.
__ The
position is required and the position description is accurate.
__ The
work can be distributed to other positions.
Those positions include (list them).
__ The
position can be reengineered at a lower level and the new PD is attached to
this memorandum.
____________________________________
Staff
Office Director/Agency Head Signature
____________________________________
HR
Director Signature
Appendix
C
SUPERVISOR-TO-EMPLOYEE
RATIO REVIEW REPORT FORMAT
Complete
this report by January 31 of each year and submit to OHRM by February 15.
Staff
Office/Agency: Date:
Point
of contact name:
Point
of contact address:
Point
of contact phone:
Point
of contact email:
Average
Staff Office/Agency supervisor-to-employee ratio (includes all levels of the
organization starting with the Administrator down).
List
the organization entities that are direct reports to the Agency Head/Staff Office
Director and their respective supervisor-to-employee ratio.
Organization Ratio
List
the organization entities that are two levels down from the Agency Head/Staff Office
Director and their respective supervisor-to-employee ratio.
Organization Ratio
____________________________________
Staff
Office Director/Agency Head Signature
____________________________________
HR
Director Signature